Forest Inventory of a Northern Hardwood Forest: Watershed 5 (7 yrs after the whole-tree harvest) 1990
DOWNLOAD DATA
w590veg.txt
RELATED LINKS
VIEW EML
(what is EML?)
vegetation_-_fore...
TITLE
Forest Inventory of a Northern Hardwood Forest: Watershed 5 (7 yrs after the whole-tree harvest) 1990
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR(s)
Thomas G. Siccama
Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
New Haven, CT 06511
USA
OTHERS INVOLVED
Chris Johnson
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University
Syracuse, NY 13244
USA
Steve Hamburg
Center for Environmental Studies, Urban Ecology Laboratory, Brown University
Providence, RI 02912
USA
Tim Fahey
Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
USA
Charley Driscoll
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University
Syracuse, NY 13244
USA
Gene Likens
Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Millbrook, NY 12545
USA
BEGIN DATE
1982
END DATE
Ongoing
LOCATION
Watershed 5 is a 22.5-ha watershed extending from an elevation of 503-m at the weir to 755-m at the highest point on the ridge.
West bounding coordinate: -71.739853
East bounding coordinate: -71.687683
North bounding coordinate: 43.957100
South bounding coordinate: 43.939945
Elevation
Minimum: 503
Maximum: 755
(Unit: meter)
SAMPLING BACKGROUND
The watershed was surveyed in 1982 and clearcut in 1983. Post-cut tree surveys were initiated in 1990 and repeated in 1994 and 1999. These data were collected in the summer of 1990. The hydrology has been monitored since 1962. The stream water chemistry has been monitored since 1963. In 1982, before the clearcut, the watershed was forested by typical northern hardwood species (sugar maple, beech and yellow birch) on the lower 85 % of its area and by a montane boreal transition forest of red spruce, balsam fir and white birch on the highest 15%. Surveying techniques were used in 1982 to install a grid system of 360 grid units, each 25 x 25-m square. These grid units serve as the plot system. See the following webpages for more information: http://www.hubbardbrook.org/watersheds/maps/w5_veg_map.htm and http://www.hubbardbrook.org/watersheds/w5_grid_elevations.htm.
SAMPLING DESIGN
The inventory consists of all trees >=1.5-cm dbh within 199 circular plots (1.37-m radius) on the lower two-thirds of the watershed ("low" and "mid" elevations). Plots were not located within specific grid units, as is generally the case, but along temporary transects. There were 17 plots sampled with no trees large enough to meet the survey criteria.
DATA DESCRIPTION
The data consist of the diameters (dbh) of all trees >1.5-cm dbh, live and dead, in 199 circular plots (1.37-m radius) on the lower two-thirds of the watershed. (1361 individual stems). Dead trees were recorded as standing dead trees (trees dead but retaining most of their fine branches) and as snags (trees broken off above dbh or with only their major large branches still intact). Live trees were noted "sick" if they had very sparse foliage or yellowing foliage in the mid summer sampling. All stems that met the size criteria were measured individually, and in some years it was noted whether a stem was part of a group of stems from the same tree (i.e. multiple stems that split from a single trunk below breast height). For W5, whether or not a stem was part of a group was recorded in all post-harvest survey years.
NOTES
For extensive notes about the details of these surveys and subsequent calculations, see the notes indicated at the bottom of the interactive calculation programs.
CALCULATIONS
Aboveground and belowground biomass was estimated for each stem in the inventory and is included in the data. Estimates were based on species-specific allometric equations developed at Hubbard Brook. See "How do we quantify a forest?" for details. Phytosociology or biomass summaries can be obtained by using our interactive calculators. Phytosociology summaries include basal area, density and frequency of each species for the watershed as a whole or for smaller units as chosen by the user. Diameter distributions for a specific species can also be selected. Biomass summaries include biomass estimates by plant part for each species for the watershed as a whole or for smaller units as chosen by the user. Options to estimate productivity and total nutrient pools in the vegetation are also available. For extensive details about how these calculations are made, see the notes indicated at the bottom of the calculator pages.
REFERENCES
DATA ACCESS GUIDELINES
Publications using these data from the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study must include the following paragraph: Some data used in this publication were obtained by scientists of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study; this publication has not been reviewed by those scientists. The Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest is operated and maintained by the Northeastern Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. Please note that data sharing and availability policy varies among the datasets available. Publishers of Hubbard Brook data are encouraged to contact the original data provider to obtain information for an acknowledgement of the original funding source of the research.
The access to all LTER data is subject to requirements set forth by this policy document to enable data providers to track usage, evaluate its impact in the community, and confirm users' acceptance of the terms of acceptable use. These requirements are standardized across the LTER Network to provide contractual exchange of data between Site Data Providers, Network Data Providers, and Data Users that can be encoded into electronic form and exchanged between computers. This will allow direct access to data via a common portal once these requirements have been fulfilled. The following information may be required directly or by proxy prior to the transference of any data object:
Registration
Name
Affiliation
Email address
Full Contact Info
Acceptance of the General Public Use Agreement or Restricted Data Use Agreement, as applicable
A Statement of Intended Use that is compliant with the above agreements. Such statements may be made submitted explicitly or made implicitly via the data access portal interface.
The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. Permission to use this dataset is granted to the Data User free of charge subject to the following terms:
Acceptable Use. Use of the dataset will be restricted to academic, research, educational, government, recreational, or other not-for-profit professional purposes. The Data User is permitted to produce and distribute derived works from this dataset provided that they are released under the same license terms as those accompanying this Data Set. Any other uses for the Data Set or its derived products will require explicit permission from the dataset owner.
Redistribution. The data are provided for use by the Data User. The metadata and this license must accompany all copies made and be available to all users of this Data Set. The Data User will not redistribute the original Data Set beyond this collaboration sphere.
Citation. It is considered a matter of professional ethics to acknowledge the work of other scientists. Thus, the Data User will properly cite the Data Set in any publications or in the metadata of any derived data products that were produced using the Data Set. Citation should take the following general form: Creator, Year of Data Publication, Title of Dataset, Publisher, Dataset identifier.
Acknowledgement. The Data User should acknowledge any institutional support or specific funding awards referenced in the metadata accompanying this dataset in any publications where the Data Set contributed significantly to its content. Acknowledgements should identify the supporting party, the party that received the support, and any identifying information such as grant numbers.
Notification. The Data User will notify the Data Set Contact when any derivative work or publication based on or derived from the Data Set is distributed. The Data User will provide the data contact with two reprints of any publications resulting from use of the Data Set and will provide copies, or on-line access to, any derived digital products. Notification will include an explanation of how the Data Set was used to produce the derived work.
Collaboration. The Data Set has been released in the spirit of open scientific collaboration. Data Users are thus strongly encouraged to consider consultation, collaboration and/or co-authorship with the Data Set Creator.
By accepting this Data Set, the Data User agrees to abide by the terms of this agreement. The Data Owner shall have the right to terminate this agreement immediately by written notice upon the Data User's breach of, or non-compliance with, any of its terms. The Data User may be held responsible for any misuse that is caused or encouraged by the Data User's failure to abide by the terms of this agreement.
By viewing or downloading the data, I certify that I accept the conditions herein
While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and documentation contained in this Data Set, complete accuracy of data and metadata cannot be guaranteed. All data and metadata are made available "as is". The Data User holds all parties involved in the production or distribution of the Data Set harmless for damages resulting from its use or interpretation.
Digital data and its metadata derived from any research activity such as field observations, collections, laboratory analysis, experiments, or the post-processing of existing data and identified by a unique identifier issued by a recognized cataloging authority such as a site, university, agency, or other organization.
ndividual to whom access has been granted to this Data Set, including his or her immediate collaboration sphere, defined here as the institutions, partners, students and staff with whom the Data User collaborates, and with whom access must be granted, in order to fulfill the Data User's intended use of the Data Set
individual or institution that produced the Data Set
individual or institution that holds intellectual property rights to the dataset. Note that this may or may not be defined as a legal copyright. If no other party is designated in the metadata as Data Set Owner, it may be presumed that these rights are held by the Data Set Creator.
individual or institution providing access to the Data Sets.
party designated in the accompanying metadata of the Data Set as the primary contact for the Data Set.
NOTES ON DATA
Several papers have been published based on research of the effects of tree harvesting on Watershed 5.
The data is physically located at the Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies. Original field notes are in Greeley Lab, 370 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT. It was last updated in March, 2004 by Ellen Denny.
CONTACT PERSON
Thomas G. Siccama
Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
205 Prospect St.
New Haven, CT 06511
USA

Phone: (203)-432-5140
Email: thomas.siccama@yale.edu

Data file: w590veg.txt
Description: Tree data for Watershed 5 1990
Column Variable Description Units Coded? Missing value label
1 Plot plot number none y none
2 Zn vegetation zone none y -
3 Sp species acronym none y none
4 Sp# species number none y none
5 Seq# sequence number (unique number for each tree; multiple stems of same tree have same sequence) none y none
6 Tag# tag number (not relevant for W5 at this time) none y -
7 Dbh diameter at breast height, in cm centimeter n none
8 Vig vigor code none y none
9 AbvBmss aboveground biomass in kilograms estimated for each stem kilogram n -
10 BlwBmss belowground biomass in kilograms estimated for each stem kilogram n -
11 Area plot area in square meters for plot on which trees >=1.5 cm dbh were measured squareMeter n none

CODES

Variable: Plot
Description:
An integer representing the plot
Variable: Zn
Code
Description
-
not applicable for W5 1990 since plots cannot be assigned to grid units
Variable: Sp, Sp#
Sp#
Sp code
Sp/Sp# description
1
ACSA
Sugar maple (Acer saccharum)
2
FAGR
American beech (Fagus grandifolia)
3
BEAL
Yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis)
4
FRAM
White ash (Fraxinus americana)
5
ACSP
Mountain maple (Acer spicatum)
6
ACPE
Striped maple or moose wood (Acer pensylvanicum)
7
PRPE
Pin or fire cherry (Prunus pensylvanica)
8
PRVI
Choke cherry (Prunus virginiana)
9
ABBA
Balsam fir (Abies balsamea)
10
PIRU
Red spruce (Picea rubens)
11
BEPA
White or paper birch (Betula papyrifera)
12
SOAM
Mountain ash (Sorbus americana)
13
ACRU
Red maple (Acer rubrum)
14
TSCA
Eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis)
15
UNKN
unknown, used for unidentifiable rotten snags
16
POTR
Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides)
17
PRSE
Black cherry (Prunus serotina)
18
AMSP
Shadbush (Amelanchier sp.)
19
POGR
Big-tooth aspen (Populus grandidentata)
20
SASP
Willow (Salix sp.)
21
COAL
Alternate-leaved dogwood (Cornus alternifolia)
22
PRSP
Cherry (unspecified) (Prunus sp.)
-
NONE
"NONE" appears in this column for those lines that represent a plot with no trees large enough to meet the survey criteria.
Variable: Seq#
Description:
A positive integer representing the sequence number for the current sample
Variable: Tag#
Description:
A positive integer tag identifier
Variable: Vig
Code
Description
0
healthy
1
diseased beech (with beech bark disease)
2
diseased beech with crown in decline
3
sick (trees with crown in decline)
4
standing dead tree
5
standing dead snag (no limbs left)