American beech (Fagus grandifolia
in the Hubbard Brook forest:

        American beech is one of the dominant canopy species of the northern hardwood forest found at all but the highest elevations in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest.  It is one of the most shade tolerant hardwood species in the forest, and therefore, has increased its presence in the canopy as the forest has matured since logging in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.  Beech regeneration is very persistent in the Hubbard Brook forest and beech saplings now fill the understory in most areas, excluding the regeneration of other tree species.

        1.  Beech abundance in the forest community
        2.  Beech regeneration
        3.  Beech bark disease
        4.  Beech leaves and branching pattern
        5.  Beech tree rings
        6.  Beech tree cross-section
 
 
 
 

1. Beech abundance in the forest community

        American beech, sugar maple, and yellow birch are the three major hardwood canopy species of the Hubbard Brook forest.  Yellow birch is slowly disappearing as the larger trees die and are replaced by beech and sugar maple.  Beech bark disease (BBD) swept through the area in the mid 1970s, damaging and even killing many of the larger beech trees.  Despite the disease, however, beech has remained the codominant canopy species, along with sugar maple.  Since the appearance of BBD, the sapling beech population has exploded.  As illustrated in the figure, beech saplings now make up three quarters of all the stems in the 2 to 9 cm diameter class. We suspect that damage to the aboveground portion of the larger trees by BBD stimulated sprouting from the roots.  The root sprouts have gradually grown to sapling size and have come to dominate the understory, reducing light levels at the forest floor, and making it difficult for the saplings of less shade tolerant species, such as sugar maple, to survive.  It appears that beech will continue to dominate the understory for some time to come, and it may also eventually dominate the canopy if sugar maple regeneration continues to decline.
 
 
 

2. Beech regeneration


Beech is a canopy replacing species, meaning it can regenerate in the shade of a forest canopy, including a canopy of beech.  It commonly regenerates both by seed and by root sprouting.  However, we believe that the vigorous beech regeneration at Hubbard Brook is mostly of sprout origin.  While seedlings must rely on the development of their own root systems, the young beech that have sprouted from the roots of a mature tree are nourished from the much larger root system of the parent tree.  Therefore, these young trees have the resources to sustain relatively rapid growth in their early years and quickly become healthy, vigorous saplings.

        We have conducted several collections of beech saplings since 1987 for the purposes of dimension analysis to determine their rates of growth.  Distances between bud scale scars were measured to determine rates of extension growth (this will eventually link to an explanation of how extension growth is measured), and a cross section was taken at breast height (1.37 m) to determine rates of diameter growth (will eventually link to explanation) and age (will eventually link to explanation) at breast height.  Our studies of beech saplings at Hubbard Brook reveal it takes an average of only 12 years for the saplings to reach breast height (1.37 m).  Once the trees are 1 to 3 cm in dbh, they put on between 11 and 22 cm in extension growth each year, and an average of 0.44 mm in diameter each year.

        A study of sapling population has been conducted on W6 since 1965.  There was an explosion of small beech (<50 cm tall) in 1965, before the arrival of BBD, and perhaps rampant root sprouting subsequent to the arrival of BBD (we have no data between 1965 and 1977, by which time the disease was in full swing).  The graph below shows beech and sugar maple stem densities for saplings between 1.5 and 9.5 cm dbh.  We can follow this beech population explosion through the diameter classes.  Most of the trees had reached the 2 cm diameter class by 1992, after which the density of this size class began to decline.  The front of the "hump" has moved into successively larger diameter classes in successively later years, reaching the 6 cm diameter class in 1997, as evidenced by the first significant increase for that size class.

        Over the same time period, sugar maple sapling densities have been steadily declining.  Beech is very effective at intercepting light in the understory, and we believe it is the shading effect of beech that is the cause of this decline in sugar maple regeneration.  Canopy damage from the ice storm of 1998 may provide a chance for the sugar maple regeneration to recover--sugar maple can grow more quickly than beech at higher understory light levels.  However, understory beech at Hubbard Brook is extremely vigorous and seems to be poised to take full advantage of any extra light reaching the understory.  It may not be until this cohort of beech replaces the canopy that sugar maple regeneration has another chance to thrive.
 


Note:  The stems/ha scale for sugar maple is only 20% of the beech scale. Also, note the steady decline of sugar maple in most diameter classes between 1965 and 1997.

 
 
 

3. Beech bark disease
 

        These photos show varying degrees of beech bark disease (BBD).  The first photo shows normal beech bark which is very smooth, even on very large trees.  The second photo shows isolated "cankers".  The disease is a pathogen complex involving a scale insect and a nectria fungus.  The insect pierces the bark to feed, creating a place for the fungus to enter at a later date.  The fungus begins to grow within the bark, resulting in the round scars.  The last photo is of bark severely affected by the disease, where individual "cankers" have grown together indicating that the fungus has spread completely around the bole.  Fungal activity interrupts the tree's normal physiological processes, and a severely infected tree will most likely die.  Trees that do not die will remain weak and become more susceptible to wind damage.

        Beech bark disease first arrived in North America around 1890 in Nova Scotia. By 1932 it was present in Maine, and by the the 1970s it had swept through the Hubbard Brook forest.  Typically BBD has spread rapidly through an area with an "advancing front" of the scale insect, followed by a "killing front" of heavy infestations of the scale insect and nectria fungus.  Within the killing front many of the larger trees will die or be left in a weakened state.  The extremely smooth bark of small young trees is less susceptible to infestation by the scale insect, so these trees often remain healthy.  In the wake of these fronts is left an "aftermath zone", where populations of both the scale insect and the nectria fungus remain in reduced numbers.  Although less active, BBD remains in the forest, infecting individual trees as they grow large enough to become inviting to the scale insect.


This is the white "woolly" wax that is secreted by the scale insect in the early stages of beech bark disease.

Beech bark disease links:




 

4. Beech leaves and branching patterns


Beech generally spends the early part of its life in the forest understory where light is limited.  Therefore, the architecture of saplings is adapted to these low light conditions.  Branches tend to grow outward as well as upward, and for this reason growth in the length of the main stem is termed "extension" growth rather than height growth.  Leaves are "two-ranked", meaning they are arranged on either side of the twig, each twig's leaves lying in a single plane.  Spreading branches with leaves in a single plane allow beech saplings to create many layers of photosynthetic tissue oriented perpendicular to the light filtering down from the canopy.  This growth form insures that much of the light not captured by an individual's higher layer of leaves will be captured by a successively lower layer, making beech very efficient at intercepting any available light that reaches the understory.
 
 




 

5. Beech tree rings

        This core was taken from the bole of a beech tree. Each ring represents a year. By measuring the widths of the rings and multiplying by two, we can estimate the amount of diameter growth in any given year.  These rings are fairly easy to distinguish, but the smaller rings of slower growing trees can be very difficult to read.
 



6. Beech tree cross-section


This cross section was taken at breast height (1.37 m) from the bole of a beech on the edge of a rain gauge clearing (shown actual size).  The tree was cut in October 1990 and the outermost ring was from that year.  Notice that the oldest six rings visible (at the bottom of the picture) are relatively wide indicating a period of fast growth.  Then growth slows for the next 18 years. The fairly sharp increase in growth in 1969-70 is probably the result of the removal of near-by trees related to the maintenance of the rain gauge clearing.  (Bluish marks are traces of writing from a permanent marker.)
 





 

This cross section was taken at the base of a beech sapling.

(Magnification = 3.5)




[ stop 3 | trail map | W6 front page | main HBES homepage ]



Web page created January 2001
by Ellen Denny and Thomas Siccama